Part 2: Functionality

A unifying reference crossed out, held in check, grounded to the extent that it carries the weight of the dichotomy addressed in any commentary or question, for much as a heart is designed to pump blood so to would this new language communicate aggregates in a series of assertions that address the activity of a subject as well as the ontological weight of an object, the “divine similitude” found lacking since the fall of the Tower of Babel. The key or indivisible mirror of this new form would sweep the diversity of structure in human language clear of all vagaries, would do away with the subjunctive sorrows that accrue in the shadows of any language or system of communication, wherein beliefs may be waylaid for appropriate environmental conditions, or rather, the pathetic relics of state that arise in political discourse inevitable to any such system, a bed of snakes developed with the intent to obfuscate simple matters and deride linguistic organization as a whole.